MODIFIED STARCH · VERIFIED REPORT DATA
Food-Grade Modified Starch
If you are evaluating food-grade modified starch for an industrial food process, this page helps you compare the currently documented grades before you request a sample or bulk quotation. The available reports cover hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate DM-750 / DM-754 and oxidized starch DM-802, with actual batch data presented separately from unverified application claims.
For buyers searching for modified potato starch, E1404 modified starch or E1442 modified starch, the product name alone is not enough for approval. Use the interactive batch data below to review what the reports confirm, then request the current TDS, batch COA, botanical-source declaration and application evidence required by your own QA or R&D team.
SOURCE-GROUNDED PRODUCT INFORMATION
What the current documents actually verify
A professional modified starch purchasing decision should begin with product identity, current batch evidence and the processing conditions in your own formulation—not with an assumed performance claim copied from a generic modified starch description.
The supplied quality reports identify two documented modified starch families: hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate represented by DM-750 and DM-754, and oxidized starch represented by DM-802. For each reported batch, you can review physical and chemical parameters such as drying loss, pH, whiteness, fineness, substituent-related values and regulated residues. These records give procurement and quality teams a practical starting point for comparing a food-grade modified starch supplier before moving to TDS, COA, sample and commercial review.
Select a documented grade that can meet your purchasing specification and be validated in your process. For modified potato starch, E1404 or E1442, verify product identity and origin in current documents. For frozen foods or sauce thickening, confirm the required performance using grade-specific technical data and an application trial.
The available reports do not state the botanical source of the base starch or provide viscosity curves, gelatinization profiles, recommended dosage, application suitability, heat, shear, acid or freeze-thaw performance data. For modified potato starch, E1404 or E1442 procurement, review the current TDS, regulatory declaration and manufacturer documents, then confirm the required performance in an application trial matching your process.
INTERACTIVE MODIFIED STARCH DATA
Switch between DM-750, DM-754 and DM-802 before opening the full report table
Start with six purchasing-relevant indicators instead of reading a long specification table from top to bottom. Select a documented modified starch grade to see its batch result, the requirement printed in the report and a short explanation of what the number can—and cannot—tell you. QA and R&D users can then open the complete batch data only when deeper review is needed.
SELECTED REPORT SNAPSHOT
DM-750 · Hydroxypropyl Distarch Phosphate
DM-750 is documented as hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate under GB 29931-2013 with 25 kg/bag packaging. The cards below highlight hydroxypropyl content, 80-mesh fineness, whiteness, drying loss, pH and SO₂ residue so a buyer can screen the report quickly before opening the full data set. The report does not by itself confirm E1442 identity, potato base-starch source or application performance.
Use the reported hydroxypropyl value as a batch identity and quality-control reference. It does not, by itself, prove E1442 regulatory identity or predict performance in your sauce, frozen food, meat, noodle or bakery formulation.
The 80-mesh passing rate helps procurement and production teams understand particle-size screening for the reported batch. Confirm whether your receiving specification uses the same sieve condition before comparing suppliers.
Whiteness is a measurable appearance parameter in the report. It can support incoming inspection, but a higher number does not automatically mean better modified starch functionality in the finished food.
Loss on drying is a report-level moisture-related quality parameter. Compare the current batch against the applicable specification because storage, handling and production approval depend on the material actually supplied.
Reported pH helps QA compare a batch with the stated acceptance range. It does not establish acid resistance of the modified starch inside a customer formulation.
SO₂ residue is a regulated quality-control parameter in the supplied reports. Buyers should check the current batch COA and destination-market requirements for the shipment being approved.
Open complete batch dataFor QA / technical review
The expanded table preserves the report-level parameters for the selected modified starch batch. Use it to compare the historic result with the stated report requirement, but confirm the current commercial TDS and current-batch COA before approval because these values are not presented as permanent guaranteed specifications.
| Parameter | Report requirement | Batch result |
|---|---|---|
| Loss on drying | ≤10.0% | 4.9% |
| pH | 5.5–7.5 | 6.7 |
| Spots | ≤0.50 /cm² | 0.10 /cm² |
| Whiteness | ≥89.0% | 89.9% |
| Fineness — 80 mesh pass | ≥80.0% | 94.5% |
| Residual phosphate (as P) | ≤0.04% | <0.04% |
| Hydroxypropyl | ≤7.0 g/100g | 4.2 g/100g |
| Chloropropanol | ≤1.0 mg/kg | <1.0 mg/kg |
| SO₂ residue | ≤30 mg/kg | 5.9 mg/kg |
| Total arsenic (as As) | ≤0.5 mg/kg | <0.5 mg/kg |
| Lead (Pb) | ≤1.0 mg/kg | <1.0 mg/kg |
These are individual report results, not universal guaranteed specifications. Confirm the current TDS and COA before procurement or formulation decisions.
DM-750 VS DM-754
Compare the two hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate batches without reading two long tables
These visual bars only make the two reported batch values easier to scan. They are not a quality ranking and they do not establish which grade is better for your food process. Use the comparison to identify where the reports differ, then ask for the current TDS, COA and representative sample for the grade you intend to approve.
Hydroxypropyl
DM-750 reports 4.2 g/100g hydroxypropyl and DM-754 reports 2.9 g/100g. Treat the difference as a batch/document comparison point rather than an automatic functionality ranking.
Fineness — 80 mesh pass
The reported 80-mesh passing rates are 94.5% and 99.8%. Confirm your own sieve requirement before using this difference in supplier approval.
Whiteness
Reported whiteness is 89.9% for DM-750 and 89.2% for DM-754. The visual difference is intentionally small because the report values are close.
Loss on drying
Loss on drying is 4.9% for DM-750 and 6.6% for DM-754. Both values should be interpreted against the requirement printed in the respective report.
The bar length is a visual aid for comparing the two reported values only. It is not a score, performance claim, or guaranteed specification.
VERIFIED GRADES
Modified starch grades supported by the supplied reports
Use the interactive data above for fast screening, then review the two documented modified starch families below in commercial context. For a purchase specification such as modified potato starch, E1404 modified starch or E1442 modified starch, ask for documentation that explicitly supports the requested botanical source and regulatory identity before placing a bulk order.
DM-750 · DM-754
Hydroxypropyl Distarch Phosphate
DM-750 and DM-754 are documented as hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate in 25 kg bags, with both factory QC reports referencing GB 29931-2013 and concluding that the tested batches meet the stated requirements. Their batch values are not identical, so procurement should keep the model number linked to the correct TDS and COA rather than treating the two grades as interchangeable.
For customers searching for E1442 modified starch or E1442 modified potato starch, the next step is document verification. The supplied reports support the hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate product name, but they do not print E1442/INS 1442 and do not state the botanical source. Request the current regulatory declaration and base-starch statement before using either term in a formal purchase specification.
Review E1442 / Hydroxypropyl Distarch Phosphate →DM-802
Oxidized Starch
DM-802 is documented as oxidized starch in 25 kg bags under GB 29927-2013, and the supplied factory report concludes that the tested batch meets its stated requirements. A separate GTTC oxidized starch report provides independent test evidence for another sample and records compliance with GB 29927-2013 for the tested items.
For buyers searching for E1404 modified starch or E1404 modified potato starch, keep product identity, international additive code and botanical source as separate approval checks. The current reports support the oxidized starch identity, but they do not print E1404 and do not state that the base starch is potato. Those points should be confirmed in current commercial documentation.
Review E1404 / Oxidized Starch →WHAT IS VERIFIED
Facts you can use now in a buyer review
The following information comes from the corresponding product test reports and supports procurement, quality and R&D review of product identity and batch quality. Each result applies to the sample and conditions stated in its report. Food-application performance requires current technical data and formulation trials.
Grade identity
The supplied reports identify DM-750 and DM-754 as hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate and DM-802 as oxidized starch. These verified names should remain the primary product identities until current commercial documents confirm any E/INS code or botanical-source wording.
25 kg packaging
All three factory quality reports state 25 kg per bag. This is a source-backed packaging fact for the reported products, but pallet pattern, container loading and export packing details still need order-specific confirmation.
Applicable standards
DM-750 and DM-754 reference GB 29931-2013, while DM-802 and the separate third-party oxidized starch report reference GB 29927-2013. Buyers should still review the destination-market regulatory declaration required for their import market.
Batch qualification
The supplied factory reports conclude that the tested batches are qualified against the requirements printed in those reports. This supports batch-level quality review but should not be presented as proof of future-batch performance or a finished-food result.
Independent test evidence
The GTTC oxidized starch report adds independent third-party test evidence for a submitted sample, including regulated residues and identification tests. It is valuable for supplier review, but it is a separate sample and should not replace the current COA for the commercial lot being purchased.
BEFORE GRADE SELECTION
What still needs technical confirmation
Before you approve a modified starch supplier or write modified potato starch, E1404 modified starch or E1442 modified starch into a final purchasing specification, close the following evidence gaps with current documents and application trials. These items are intentionally visible so your technical team can see what still needs confirmation.
- Confirm the botanical/base-starch source with a current manufacturer or raw-material declaration, especially when the purchase specification requires modified potato starch rather than a generic modified starch identity.
- Confirm the current viscosity or pasting profile, test method and any gelatinization-related behaviour from the TDS if those properties matter to your process; the supplied QC reports do not provide those curves.
- Confirm recommended food applications, dosage guidance and formulation limitations with product-specific technical documentation instead of assuming that a modified starch name automatically fits sauces, meat, noodles, frozen food or bakery.
- Confirm heat, shear, acid and freeze-thaw performance with application data or controlled trials under your actual temperature, pH, solids, mixing, freezing, storage and reheating conditions.
- Confirm the destination-market regulatory declaration, current commercial specification, packaging configuration and batch COA for the exact material being ordered before bulk shipment approval.
Modified Starch FAQ
Technical & Buying Questions About Modified Starch
Source-backed answers for buyers reviewing food grade modified starch, DM-750, DM-754, DM-802, E1404/E1442 terminology, batch COA data and application validation.
01What is the documented difference between DM-750 and DM-754 hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate modified starch?+
The supplied modified starch reports identify both DM-750 and DM-754 as hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate and assess them against GB 29931-2013, but their reported batch values are not identical. DM-750 shows 4.2 g/100g hydroxypropyl and 94.5% passing an 80-mesh sieve, while DM-754 shows 2.9 g/100g hydroxypropyl and 99.8% passing. Their pH and whiteness results also differ slightly. These are batch test results, not proof that one modified starch grade is universally better. A buyer should compare the current TDS, batch COA and intended food-processing conditions before selecting DM-750 or DM-754.
02Is DM-802 oxidized starch the same product buyers commonly call E1404 modified starch?+
The supplied DM-802 report identifies the product as oxidized starch and references GB 29927-2013, but the report itself does not print the E1404 designation. Buyers searching for E1404 modified starch should therefore request the current TDS, regulatory declaration or specification showing the applicable E/INS identity before treating DM-802 as an E1404 purchase specification. This distinction is important for food grade modified starch procurement because a product name, a national standard and an international additive code are related documents but are not interchangeable evidence.
03Can DM-750 and DM-754 be purchased as E1442 modified starch based only on these reports?+
The reports identify DM-750 and DM-754 as hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate, but do not print E1442 or INS 1442. If E1442 modified starch is required, obtain the current TDS, regulatory identity declaration and batch COA before ordering to verify the commercial identity needed for export and customer approval. The test results support review of the reported batches; confirm the E/INS code in current product documentation that explicitly states it.
04Do the DM-750, DM-754 and DM-802 reports confirm that these products are modified potato starch?+
No. The available modified starch reports confirm the modified-starch product names and tested quality data, but they do not state whether the base starch is potato starch, corn starch, tapioca starch or another botanical source. If you are specifically sourcing modified potato starch from a modified starch supplier, request a current TDS, raw-material declaration or manufacturer document that explicitly identifies the base starch as potato. Confirm botanical origin through a raw-material declaration or manufacturer document; product names, website domains and categories do not establish that origin.
05Which quality parameters are available for DM-750 and DM-754 food grade modified starch?+
The DM-750 and DM-754 food grade modified starch reports include drying loss, pH, spots, whiteness, 80-mesh fineness, residual phosphate, hydroxypropyl content, epichlorohydrin, sulfur dioxide residue, total arsenic and lead. For example, the reported pH values are 6.7 and 6.5, whiteness is 89.9% and 89.2%, and 80-mesh passing rates are 94.5% and 99.8%. These figures are useful when comparing modified starch batches, but buyers should use the current batch COA and TDS rather than treating historic test results as a permanent guaranteed specification.
06What third-party test data are available for oxidized starch when reviewing an E1404 modified starch supplier?+
The supplied third-party GTTC report covers oxidized starch under GB 29927-2013 and concludes that the tested items comply with that standard. Reported results include 12.4% drying loss, sulfur dioxide below 2.0 mg/kg, carboxyl content of 0.16 g/100g, arsenic not detected at a 0.03 mg/kg quantification limit and lead not detected at a 0.05 mg/kg quantification limit. For an E1404 modified starch purchasing review, this is useful batch-level quality evidence, but the buyer should still obtain the current product identity, TDS and batch COA for the material actually being ordered.
07Do the current modified starch reports prove heat, shear, acid or freeze-thaw stability for food processing?+
No. The current modified starch reports provide identity and quality-control data, but they do not contain viscosity curves, heat-stability testing, shear-resistance testing, acid-resistance testing or freeze-thaw application results. Therefore, claims such as “modified starch for heat and shear stability” or “modified starch for frozen food processing” should not be treated as verified for DM-750, DM-754 or DM-802 from these reports alone. Food manufacturers should request application data or a current TDS and run trials under their own temperature, pH, shear, solids and storage conditions before approving a modified starch for production.
08What documents should I request from a modified starch supplier before a bulk modified starch order?+
Before placing a bulk modified starch order, request the current TDS, batch COA, exact product identity, botanical or base-starch declaration, packaging specification, applicable regulatory statement and any application data relevant to your process. If you are buying modified potato starch, E1404 modified starch or E1442 modified starch, the documents should explicitly support those identities rather than relying on the website name or an assumed equivalence. For formulation-sensitive projects, also request a representative modified starch sample and verify performance under your actual heat, shear, pH, freezing and storage conditions before commercial approval.
TECHNICAL REVIEW
Send your application and request the current technical documents
Send us your food system, process temperature, pH, shear conditions, freezing or storage requirements and the modified starch identity written in your current specification. We can use that information to focus the technical review on the documented grade family instead of sending a generic modified starch recommendation.
If you already use a modified potato starch, E1404 modified starch, E1442 modified starch or another food-grade modified starch, attach the current TDS or key acceptance parameters when possible. A side-by-side document review and representative sample trial gives your procurement and R&D teams a clearer basis for commercial approval.
Modified starch: sourced for supply; available types confirmed per order
Next: confirm specifications and trial requirements
- Describe the food, dosage, heating, shear, pH and storage conditions.
- Confirm the exact type, specification version and viscosity method; batch data does not represent every grade.
- Confirm manufacturer, packaging, delivery plan and applicable batch documents.
Specify the grade and application so document availability, samples, packaging and delivery can be confirmed.